Two sides of the Bersih 3.0 coin

Scenario 1
On one side, it is said that a sabotage was intended and hence the usual antics employed by dacing pre-Bersih 3.0 were missing as it had already laid its snare in allowing the rally to take place so that "agents" of Dacing may stir trouble to paint the People's Pact and Bersih 3.0 bad.

Scenario 2
On the other side, it is said that a hijack was intended and hence the overwhelming support by the People's Pact and provocation to "masuk dataran!" and create a scene of police brutality, etc, to paint the Dacing bad.

Scenario 3
Of course, there were the NGOs who threaded on the side of the coin and probably thought, "Hey! WTH! An opportunity to join in the parade and hitch a ride!".

Scenario 4
And then there's the RAKYAT who are often caught smacked in between, having to bear and suffer the brunt of the effects of political games.

MCQ: Which was the most likely side of the coin to face up?
A. Scenario 1
B. Scenario 2
C. Scenarios 3 & 4, or
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE

Well, here are my two tokens... (since our new coins are token-ish..)
The answer is "D". "ALL OF THE ABOVE"!

Should Bersih 4.0 ever take place, it MUST be non-partisan and for the sole purpose of demanding for EC reforms and clean & fair elections. If you intend to carry any intention/banner other than Bersih, don't even think of turning up!

THE COMMUNITY CANDIDATE

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments that contain profanities, threats, are abusive, offensive, racist and/or discriminatory in nature will not be posted.